Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515803›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics Across Subgroups of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results at Week 12 from the PSoHO Study in a Real-World Setting.

Charles Lynde, Elisabeth Riedl, Julia-Tatjana Maul, Tiago Torres, Andreas Pinter, Gabrielle Fabbrocini, Flavia Daniele, Alan Brnabic, Catherine Reed, Stefan Wilhelm and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Charles LyndeLynde Institute for Dermatology, Markham, ON, Canada. derma@lynderma.com.
Elisabeth RiedlDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia-Tatjana MaulFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tiago TorresDepartment of Dermatology and Dermatology Research Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andreas PinterDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Gabrielle FabbrociniSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Flavia DanieleMedica Dermatologa en Swiss Medical Group, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alan BrnabicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Catherine ReedEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stefan WilhelmEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Thorsten HolzkämperEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christopher SchusterDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luis PuigDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USMedical University of Vienna · ATGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHospital de Sant Pau · ESLynde Centre for Dermatology · CAUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn routine clinical care, important treatment outcomes among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) have been shown to vary according to patient demographics and disease characteristics. This study aimed to provide direct comparative effectiveness data at week 12 between anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics for the treatment of PsO across seven clinically relevant patient subgroups in the real-world setting.

methodsFrom the international, non-interventional Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), 1981 patients with moderate-to-severe PsO were grouped a priori according to seven clinically relevant demographic and disease variables with binary categories, which were sex (male or female), age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), body mass index (≤ 30 or > 30 kg/m

resultsPatients in each of the seven subgroups achieved similar response rates to those of the overall treatment cohort, apart from patients with PsA treated with other biologics who had 7-10% lower response rates. Consequently, patients with comorbid PsA had significantly higher odds of achieving skin clearance at week 12 with anti-IL-17A biologics compared to other biologics. Patients in all subgroups had significantly higher odds of achieving PASI90 and/or sPGA (0,1), PASI100, and PASI90 in the anti-IL-17A cohort relative to the other biologics cohort, except for the Asian subgroup. No sex- or age-specific differences in treatment effectiveness after 12 weeks were identified, neither between the treatment cohorts nor between the individual treatment comparisons.

conclusionsDespite relative consistency of comparative treatment effectiveness across subgroups, the presence of comorbid PsA may affect a patient's clinical response to some treatments.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticBiological ProductsPsoriasisAgedFemaleHumansInfantMaleSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBiological ProductsBiologicComorbidityDemographicEffectivenessPsoriasisReal-worldSubgroupTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36515803
PMCPMC9988734
OpenAlexW4311476820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.