Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515801›Full record

ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

The DIY IVF cycle-harnessing the power of deeptech to bring ART to the masses.

Lynae M Brayboy, Alexander M Quaas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lynae M BrayboyDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander M QuaasDivision of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecologic Endocrinology, University Hospital Basel, Frauenklinik Vogesenstrasse 134, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. Alexander.Quaas@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-2115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of telehealth including telemedicine, at-home testing, and mobile health applications has enabled patients to self-manage their reproductive care, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reproduction is rapidly changing and embracing deeptech initiatives that can improve outcomes and facilitate personalized fertility solutions in the near future. This so-called DIY IVF informed by deeptech and moderated by femtech not only holds a tremendous amount of promise, but also challenges and possible pitfalls. This review discusses the current status of deeptech and femtech for IVF care in a post-Roe v. Wade environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineFertilization in VitroHumansPandemicsReproductionAssisted reproductive technologyDeeptechDigital healthFemtechHealth technologyIn vitro fertilizationRemote monitoringWearables

Identifiers

PMID36515801
PMCPMC9748870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.