Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515733›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

High resorption rates following glenoid augmentation procedures do not seem to lead to higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cain Rutgers, Lukas P E Verweij, Alexander A Schuit, Inger N Sierevelt, Faridi S Jamaludin, Henk-Jan van der Woude, Michel P J van den Bekerom

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cain RutgersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.rutgers@student.vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7050-2431
Lukas P E VerweijAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander A SchuitDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inger N SiereveltDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xpert Clinics, Laarderhoogtweg 12, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faridi S JamaludinAmsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Research Support, Medical Library AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk-Jan van der WoudeShoulder and Elbow Unit, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Oosterpark 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel P J van den BekeromDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
OLVG · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone augmentation techniques show a relatively high complication rate, which might be due to graft non-union and resorption. It is unclear which augmentation techniques demonstrate the highest amount of non-union and resorption and whether this leads to worse clinical or functional outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review was (i) to compare non-union and resorption rates between surgical approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods regarding clinical and functional outcomes and (ii) determine whether high non-union or resorption rates lead to less favorable clinical or functional outcomes.

methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements were followed. PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid) and Cochrane Library were searched on December 15th 2021 for studies examining bone graft non-union or resorption using radiograph or CT following glenoid augmentation to treat anterior shoulder dislocation.

resultsThe search resulted in 103 inclusions, comprising 5,128 glenoid augmentations. When comparing pooled proportions of bony union, graft fracture rate, hardware failure rate, recurrence rate, return to sports and Rowe score, most results were similar between approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods. High resorption rates were seen for allograft augmentation (74.3; 95% CI: 39.8-92.7) compared to autograft augmentation (15.5; 95% CI 10.1-23.2), but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Meta-analyses (8 studies; 494 patients) demonstrated no difference in incomplete and complete non-union rates between arthroscopic and open procedures; however, both analyses showed substantial heterogeneity. Higher partial resorption rates were observed on CT (48.0; 95% CI 43.3-52.7) compared to radiograph (14.1; 95% CI 10.9-18.1). Three studies comprising 267 shoulders demonstrated a higher rate of non-union and recurrence in smokers, whereas one study comprising 38 shoulders did not.

conclusionNon-union and resorption rates were similar among procedures, grafts and fixation methods. Higher resorption rates were observed in allografts, but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Pooling data demonstrated substantial heterogeneity and definitions varied among studies, warranting more standardized measuring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityShoulder DislocationShoulder JointArthroscopyHumansRecurrenceScapulaAllograftsBone augmentationBone graftsBone unionBony stabilizationImaging and radiologyJoint stabilization surgeryShoulder injuriesShoulder instabilitySports medicine

Identifiers

PMID36515733
OpenAlexW4311474673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.