Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515691›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2024

Development of a disease conceptual model of patient experience with metastatic colorectal cancer: identification of the most salient symptoms and impacts.

Isabelle Guillemin, Mahesh Darpelly, Brendon Wong, Anders Ingelgård, Ingolf Griebsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Determining what matters most to patients: qualitative interview techniques and methodological considerations for concept saliency analysis and reporting.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabelle GuilleminIQVIA, Paris, France. isabelle.guillemin@iqvia.com.
Mahesh DarpellyIQVIA, Bangalore, India.
Brendon WongBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Anders IngelgårdBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Ingolf GriebschBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEIQVIA (France) · FRIQVIA (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) experience multiple symptoms and impacts affecting their health-related quality of life. However, there is limited data on self-reported experience of the most relevant and bothersome aspects of patients living with mCRC.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted in patients with mCRC to identify and understand the signs, symptoms and impacts experienced. Patients were also asked to rate the level of bothersomeness for each concept reported on a scale ranging from 0 ("not bothersome at all") to 10 ("extremely bothersome"). Verbatim transcripts were analysed following a thematic analysis approach. The most salient concepts were identified (i.e. reported by > 50% of patients with a bothersome rating ≥ 5 out of 10).

resultsTwenty-five patients (USA; age: 26 to 72 years old) were interviewed. Patients reported 58 signs and symptoms, amongst which 8 were considered salient: fatigue, nausea, neuropathy, diarrhoea, loss of appetite, constipation, weight loss, and abdominal pain; 35 impacts were identified, and 7 were considered salient: reduced ability to work, interference with daily activities, impact on cognitive functioning, financial impact, sleep changes, impact on social life and walking difficulties. The concepts identified helped refine a literature-based disease conceptual model of patient experience with mCRC.

conclusionsThe interviews provided insights into the most bothersome and salient signs, symptoms and impacts affecting the HRQoL of patients living with mCRC. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is a need to improve clinical strategies for future clinical development and inform clinical practice decision-making for mCRC survivors.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisMetastatic colorectal cancer; Self-reported experience; Health-related quality of life; Interviews; Conceptual model

Identifiers

PMID36515691
PMCPMC9748881
OpenAlexW4311474990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.