Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515619›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Claudia González Alfano, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Vianette Montagne, Irela Soto, James Porter, Vipul Patel, Ruben Ureña, Elias Bodden

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Medtronic's HugoJournal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. The Prevalence of Climacturia in Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  4. Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia González AlfanoHospital Pacífica Salud, Punta Pacífica, Panama.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Florida, USA.
Vianette MontagneHospital Pacífica Salud, Punta Pacífica, Panama.
Irela SotoHospital Pacífica Salud, Punta Pacífica, Panama.
James PorterSwedish Medical Center Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vipul PatelAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Florida, USA.
Ruben UreñaHospital Pacífica Salud, Punta Pacífica, Panama.
Elias BoddenHospital Pacífica Salud, Punta Pacífica, Panama.
Hospital Punta Pacifica · PAUniversity of Central Florida · USSwedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe results and benefits of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) are already established in the literature. However, new robotic platforms have been released recently in the market and their outcomes are still unknown. In this scenario, our objective is to describe our experience implementing the HugoTM RAS robot and report the clinical data of patients who underwent Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent RARP with HugoTM RAS System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) from June to October 2021. The patients underwent transperitoneal RARP on lithotomy position, using six trocars (4 robotic trocars and 2 for the assistant). We reported the clinical feasibility and safety of this platform, assessing perioperative data, including complications and early outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile ranges, categorical variables as frequencies and proportions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were safe and feasible with no major complications or conversion. Median operative time was 235 minutes (213-271), and median estimated blood loss was 300ml (100-310). Positive surgical margins were reported in 5 patients (33%). The median hospitalization time was 2 days (2-2), and the median time to remove the foley was 7 days (7-7). On the first appointment four weeks after surgery, all patients had undetectable PSA values, and 61% were continent.

conclusionsWe described preliminary results with safe and feasible procedures performed with HugoTM RAS System robotic platform. The surgeries were successfully executed with acceptable perioperative outcomes, without conversions or major complications. However, as this technology is very recent, further studies with a long-term follow-up are awaited to access postoperative functional and oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProstateProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProstatectomyRoboticsRobotic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID36515619
PMCPMC10247240
OpenAlexW4311930361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.