ArticleJournal of psychosocial oncology2023
"
Article in Journal of psychosocial oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical debt and subsequent use of alternative financial services among US adults.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- "Showing some care": interest-holders' perspectives on addressing health-related social conditions in ovarian cancer.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Providers' and Survivors' Perspectives on Affordability Challenges for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment in Two Low Socioeconomic Status States of the Southern United States.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Social Needs in Cancer Survivors: A Scoping Review and Future Directions.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Financial Toxicity Among Women with Breast Cancer Varies by Age and Race.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Catastrophic health expenditures, insurance churn, and non-employment among women with breast cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Facing financial barriers to healthcare: patient-informed adaptation of a conceptual framework for adults with a history of cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite widespread reports of cancer-related financial hardship, hospital financial assistance programs are underutilized. APPROACH: Rapid qualitative research. SAMPLE: Gynecologic oncology patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, under 65 years old, and Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity of 26 or under.
methodsSemi-structured interviews to elicit (1) financial assistance awareness/knowledge, (2) barriers to accessing assistance, and (3) suggestions for improving access. We analyzed the transcripts using thematic analysis: open coding, consensus building/codebook, and identification of salient themes.
findingsWe interviewed 25 patients and identified four barriers and three suggestions for improving access. Barriers: lack of awareness, perceptions of ineligibility, fear of negative consequences, and being overwhelmed. Suggestions: simplifying financial processes, providing individualized assistance, and being more proactive by intervening earlier.
conclusionIncrease access by reducing stigma, misconceptions, and more proactively engaging at-risk patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS: Patients may be too afraid or overwhelmed to ask for help. A more proactive, psychosocial approach is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.