Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514712›Full record

ArticleProcedia computer science2022

Smart Solutions to Keep Your Mental Balance.

Daniela Gifu, Eugen Pop

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Procedia computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela GifuInstitute of Computer Science, Romanian Academy - Iasi branch, Bulevardul Carol I, 8, 700505, Romania.
Eugen PopFaculty of Automatic Control and Computers, University "Politehnica" of Bucharest, Splaiul Independenței 313, 060032, Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the coronavirus pandemic international conflicts, dramatic changes of daily living have been enforced, including new ways of providing patient assistance, based on artificial intelligence. The influence of these changes on people's mental health is still insufficiently analyzed and explored. Chatbots like Woebot, Wysa and Tess are gaining popularity, being attractive and easy to use. These achievements led us to develop a new application, being still in the testing phase, which has a positive impact on mental healthcare issues. It is a conversational system capable to diagnose people's negative, depressive, and anxious emotions during chatting, and to act as a psychological therapist and virtual friend. The proposed system, throughout the conversation, succeeds to decrease the patient's insecurity sentiments, by comforting their mood. In fact, an intelligent assistant for different mental health issues like stress, anxiety and depression, could become a very helpful information system.

Indexed as

mental healthcaresentiment analysisvirtual assistant

Identifiers

PMID36514712
PMCPMC9729962
OpenAlexW4312128701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.