Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514701›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Detailed Analysis of Primary Non-invasive Respiratory Support and Outcomes of Subjects With COVID-19 Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure.

James Booker, Rebecca Egglestone, Jack Lushington, Maria Burova, Laura Hamilton, Elsie Hunter, Clare Morden, Darshni Pandya, Ryan Beecham, Robert MacKay and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James BookerGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Rebecca EgglestoneGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Jack LushingtonMedicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, GBR.
Maria BurovaGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Laura HamiltonGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Elsie HunterGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Clare MordenGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Darshni PandyaGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Ryan BeechamGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Robert MacKayGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Sanjay GuptaGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Michael P GrocottCritical Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Ahilanandan DushianthanCritical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, GBR.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The role of non-invasive (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Non-invasive ventilation (NIV)) respiratory support (NIRS) as a primary oxygenation strategy for COVID-19 patients with acute severe hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF), as opposed to invasive mechanical ventilation (invasive-MV), is uncertain. While NIRS may prevent complications related to invasive MV, prolonged NIRS and delays in intubation may lead to adverse outcomes. This study was conducted to assess the role of NIRS in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure and to explore the variables associated with NRIS failure. Methods This is a single-center, observational study of two distinct waves of severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Patients initially managed with non-invasive respiratory support with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure were included. Demographics, comorbidities, admission laboratory variables, and ICU admission scores were extracted from electronic health records. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for invasive mechanical ventilation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to summarise survival between the ventilatory and time-to-intubation groups. Results There were 291 patients, of which 232 were managed with NIRS as an initial ventilation strategy. There was a high incidence of failure (48.7%). Admission APACHE II score, SOFA score, HACOR score, ROX index, and PaO2/FiO2 were all predictive of NIRS failure. Daily (days 1-4) HACOR scores and ROX index measurements highly predicted NIRS failure. Late NIRS failure (>24 hours) was independently associated with increased mortality (44%). Conclusion NIRS is effective as first-line therapy for COVID-19 patients with AHRF. However, failure, particularly delayed failure, is associated with significant mortality. Early prediction of NIRS failure may prevent adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

acute hypoxemic respiratory failurecontinous positive airway pressurecovid 19non- invasive ventilationpulmonary critical care

Identifiers

PMID36514701
PMCPMC9733975
OpenAlexW4311823939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.