Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514657›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Comparison of Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Units of Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Kohji Iwai, Yasuyuki Tsujita

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kohji IwaiDivision of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation and Care, Seijoh University, Tokai, JPN.
Yasuyuki TsujitaDepartment of Critical and Intensive Care Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to investigate early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who require mechanical ventilation Methods Twenty patients with severe COVID-19 (COVID-19 group) who were admitted to the ICU between April 2020 and March 2022 were included. For the control (non-COVID-19) group, 20 individuals were selected among ICU patients admitted between April 2018 and March 2020. The controls were propensity score-matched by age, sex, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Results In the COVID-19 group, the percentage of extubated patients was significantly higher. Furthermore, mechanical ventilation and lengths of ICU stay were also significantly longer. There were no significant differences in discharge outcomes or mortality, but there was a significant difference in the number of muscle relaxants and steroid treatments utilized with the COVID-19 group, requiring more of these medications. The percentage of patients who achieved sitting on the edge of a bed was also significantly higher in the COVID-19 group, but the days between the first rehabilitation and first sitting were significantly greater in this group. Conclusion Early rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19 may be an effective measure to promote recovery. However, continued investigation is warranted.

Indexed as

covid-19early rehabilitationintensive care unitpropensity score matching analysissingle-center retrospective study

Identifiers

PMID36514657
PMCPMC9733805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.