ArticleCureus2022
Accuracy of RIPASA and Lintula Scores in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis Using Surgical Findings as the Gold Standard.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of the MZXBTCH scoring system for acute complex appendicitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendicitis is an inflammation of the vermiform appendix's inner lining that spreads to its other sections. Appendectomy is still the standard way to cure appendicitis. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still clinical and supported by a raised neutrophilic count and imaging studies; moreover, scoring systems, such as the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Lintula scores, help the clinicians in the diagnosis. The main objective of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and Lintula scores for acute appendicitis using surgical findings as the gold standard, in an Asian population.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Department of Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, and Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore. This study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2022, for the duration of two years. A total of 120 patients were enrolled after meeting the inclusion criteria, and demographic data were obtained. Lintula and RIPASA scores were recorded, and patients were classified as positive or negative based on histopathological findings. IBM SPSS Statistics,
resultsThe average age of the patients in this study was 37.39±14.36 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.14:1. Taking surgical finding as the gold standard, RIPASA scoring had a diagnosis accuracy of 91.67% while the Lintula score had a diagnostic accuracy of 79.17%.
conclusionWhile both the RIPASA and the Lintula scoring systems were accurate, the RIPASA scoring system outperformed the Lintula scoring system when surgical findings were used as the gold standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.