ArticleCureus2022
Emergence of Cerebral Mucormycosis in the Post-COVID Period: A Detailed Analysis of Risk Factors, Clinical Progression, and Management of This Opportunistic Fungal Infection.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Survival from Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis in SARS-CoV-2-Positive Diabetic Patients: Two Case Reports.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn epidemic of Mucorales was reported following the second wave of COVID-19 in India, and intracranial extension of the same was one of the most dreadful complications.
methodsA total of 62 patients with cerebral mucormycosis were recruited and followed up till 12 weeks to evaluate the risk factors, incidence, clinical manifestations, management, and prognosis of cerebral mucormycosis.
findingsA median age of 51.5 years with male predominance (74%) was noted. The majority of subjects reported a history of COVID infection (93.5%) and diabetes mellitus (83.87%). The first symptom of mucormycosis appeared after a mean period of 17.63 ± 8.9 days following COVID. Facial swelling and ptosis were the most common symptoms. Only 55% of patients had neurological presentations, and hemiparesis was the most common neurological sign (30.6%). Radiologically, the involvement of maxillary sinus (90.32%) and ethmoid sinus (87.10%) was commonly noted. Cerebral findings included temporal lobe (50%) and parietal lobe (30.06%) involvement, cavernous sinus thrombosis (30.06%), and internal carotid artery thrombosis (22.58%). Acute cerebral infarction was notable in 37% of subjects (p-value=0.0015, significant association with the outcome). Conventional and liposomal amphotericin B were used in 91.94% and 53.23% of patients, respectively. Retrobulbar amphotericin injections used in 11.3% of subjects significantly affected the outcome (p-value=0.03, significant). Posaconazole step-down therapy was used in 72.5% of subjects (p-value=0.0005, significant). Surgical interventions were performed in 53 (85.48%) subjects (p-value=0.004, significant). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery was the most common (in 64.52% of subjects), followed by maxillectomy (20.97% of subjects) and craniotomy (17.7% of subjects). At the end of 12 weeks, 33.87% of patients died and 59.68% were alive; the rest (6.45%) were lost to follow-up.
interpretationThe absence or late presentation of neurological symptoms led to a delayed diagnosis of cerebral mucormycosis. The presence of acute cerebral infarction indicated a worse prognosis. However, there was a significant influence of step-down posaconazole therapy, retrobulbar amphotericin injections, and surgical intervention on the prognosis of cerebral mucormycosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.