Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514531›Full record

ReviewEngineering in life sciences2022

Photobioreactors for cultivation and synthesis: Specifications, challenges, and perspectives.

Santiago N Chanquia, Guillem Vernet, Selin Kara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Towards industrial biological hydrogen production: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Laboratory- and Pilot-Scale Cultivation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Product safety aspects of plant molecular farming.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Immobilization and Application of Fatty Acid Photodecarboxylase in Deep Eutectic Solvents.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santiago N ChanquiaBiocatalysis and Bioprocessing Group Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-9972
Guillem VernetBiocatalysis and Bioprocessing Group Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-037X
Selin KaraBiocatalysis and Bioprocessing Group Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-2814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their versatility and the high biomass yield produced, cultivation of phototrophic organisms is an increasingly important field. In general, open ponds are chosen to do it because of economic reasons; however, this strategy has several drawbacks such as poor control of culture conditions and a considerable risk of contamination. On the other hand, photobioreactors are an attractive choice to perform cultivation of phototrophic organisms, many times in a large scale and an efficient way. Furthermore, photobioreactors are being increasingly used in bioprocesses to obtain valuable chemical products. In this review, we briefly describe different photobioreactor set-ups, including some of the recent designs, and their characteristics. Additionally, we discuss the current challenges and advantages that each different type of photobioreactor presents, their applicability in biocatalysis and some modern modeling tools that can be applied to further enhance a certain process.

Indexed as

bioprocess engineeringphotobiocatalysisphotobioreactors

Identifiers

PMID36514531
PMCPMC9731602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.