Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514530›Full record

ArticleEngineering in life sciences2022

Niklas Erdmann, Felix Kästner, Kristin de Payrebrune, Dorina Strieth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Engineering in life sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niklas ErdmannChair of Bioprocess Engineering Technical University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern Germany.
Felix KästnerChair for Computional Physics in Engineering Technical University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern Germany.
Kristin de PayrebruneChair for Computional Physics in Engineering Technical University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern Germany.
Dorina StriethChair of Bioprocess Engineering Technical University of Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When using microbiologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) to produce calcium carbonate crystals in the cavities between mineral particles to consolidate them, the inhomogeneous distribution of the precipitated calcium carbonate poses a problem for the production of construction materials with consistent parameters. Various approaches have been investigated in the literature to increase the homogeneity of consolidated samples. One approach can be the targeted application of ureolytic organisms by 3D printing. However, to date, this possibility has been little explored in the literature. In this study, the potential to use MICP to print calcium carbonate layers on mineral particles will be investigated. For this purpose, a dispensing unit was modified to apply both a suspension of

Indexed as

3D printingmicrobially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP)Sporosarcina pasteuriiureolytic activity

Identifiers

PMID36514530
PMCPMC9731594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.