ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2022
Evaluation of the circumferential location of mild reflux esophagitis (Grade A and B) in the lower esophagus.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Discrepancies have been reported in the circumferential locations of mild mucosal breaks. We investigated their locations using a new method. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Eighty patients (Grade A/B: 53/27) with mild mucosal breaks in the lower esophagus were examined. Since the 3 o'clock position corresponded to the right wall of the lower esophagus using our method with sufficient accuracy, the circumferential locations of mucosal breaks were identified as times on a clock face, which were changed to circular data to calculate the mean direction. The circumferential distribution of mucosal breaks was evaluated in the single lesion group (single group) and multiple lesion group (multiple group). Results: Forty-eight of 80 patients had 1 mucosal break, while 32 had ≥2 mucosal breaks. Circumferential locations markedly differed between the single and multiple groups. In the single group, mucosal breaks were exclusively distributed between 2 and 7 o'clock, with 50% in the 3 o'clock direction (right wall). In the multiple group, 81 mucosal breaks were distributed circumferentially, not uniformly; however, at least 1 lesion was located between 2 and 7 o'clock in 91% of subjects. Therefore, a factor for the development of mucosal breaks from the right to posterior wall was present in both groups. Conclusion: In the single group, mucosal breaks were localized from the right to posterior wall, mainly in the right wall. In the multiple group, mucosal breaks were located circumferentially, but often between the right lateral and posterior wall. These two distributions significantly differed.Clinical trial registration: This is a retrospective study, so it was not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.