ArticleHealthcare technology letters2022
Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster-based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised clustering based on a graph attention network reveals high-risk subgroups among ICU dementia patients for enhanced mortality prediction.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Graph neural networks in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: a review of unimodal and multimodal advances.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Autoencoder imputation of missing heterogeneous data for Alzheimer's disease classification.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
- A machine learning approach for identifying anatomical biomarkers of early mild cognitive impairment.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster-based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data.Healthcare technology letters · 2022Article
- Lung Radiomics Features Selection for COPD Stage Classification Based on Auto-Metric Graph Neural Network.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data-driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non-linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re-labelled AD cases. The re-labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re-labelled data with a multiclass area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.