ArticleSystematic reviews2022
All-cause mortality after major gastrointestinal bleeding among patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nationwide Trends in Gastrointestinal Bleeding Mortality Before and After the Widespread Adoption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States, 2007-2020.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- An Investigational Study on the Role of ADME Agents' Genetic Variation on DD217 Pharmacokinetics and Safety Profile.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Telitacicept for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Net Benefit of Anticoagulation in Subclinical Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Exome-wide association study of bleeding events in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.Science progressObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) bleeding represents the single most frequent site of anticoagulant-related bleeding. Adverse outcomes after major GI bleeding including mortality are not well characterized and, as a result, may be underappreciated in clinical practice. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk for 30-day all-cause mortality after major GI bleeding among patients receiving DOACs.
methodsElectronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL will be systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies reporting 30-day all-cause mortality in adults with DOAC-related major GI bleeding. At least two investigators will independently perform study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. The proportion of deaths following a major GI event relative to the number of major GI bleeding events will be calculated for each individual study, and results across studies will be pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. We will assess risk of bias using criteria proposed by the GRADE group for prognostic studies. DISCUSSION: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide clinicians and patients with estimates of mortality after the most common major bleeding event to support shared decision making about anticoagulation management.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022295815.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.