Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514158›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Automatic assessment of knee osteoarthritis severity in portable devices based on deep learning.

Jianfeng Yang, Quanbo Ji, Ming Ni, Guoqiang Zhang, Yan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianfeng Yang *Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Quanbo Ji *Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Ming NiDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Guoqiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China. gqzhang301orth@163.com.
Yan WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China. yanwang301@126.com.
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor knee osteoarthritis, the commonly used radiology severity criteria Kellgren-Lawrence lead to variability among surgeons. Most existing diagnosis models require preprocessed radiographs and specific equipment.

methodsAll enrolled patients diagnosed with KOA who met the criteria were obtained from **** Hospital. This study included 2579 images shot from posterior-anterior X-rays of 2,378 patients. We used RefineDet to train and validate this deep learning-based diagnostic model. After developing the model, 823 images of 697 patients were enrolled as the test set. The whole test set was assessed by up to 5 surgeons and this diagnostic model. To evaluate the model's performance we compared the results of the model with the KOA severity diagnoses of surgeons based on K-L scales.

resultsCompared to the diagnoses of surgeons, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.977. Its sensitivity (recall) for K-L 0 to 4 was 1.0, 0.972, 0.979, 0.983 and 0.989, respectively; for these diagnoses, the specificity of this model was 0.992, 0.997, 0.994, 0.991 and 0.995. The precision and F1-score were 0.5 and 0.667 for K-L 0, 0.914 and 0.930 for K-L 1, 0.978 and 0.971 for K-L 2, 0.981 and 0.974 for K-L 3, and 0.988 and 0.985 for K-L 4, respectively. All K-L scales perform AUC > 0.90. The quadratic weighted Kappa coefficient between the diagnostic model and surgeons was 0.815 (P < 0.01, 95% CI 0.727-0.903). The performance of the model is comparable to the clinical diagnosis of KOA. This model improved the efficiency and avoided cumbersome image preprocessing.

conclusionThe deep learning-based diagnostic model can be used to assess the severity of KOA in portable devices according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. On the premise of improving diagnostic efficiency, the results are highly reliable and reproducible.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointRadiographyArtificial intelligenceDeep learningKellgren–LawrenceKnee osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36514158
PMCPMC9749242
OpenAlexW4311325340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.