Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514149›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2022

Effect of wither application of an analogue of pig appeasing pheromone on encounters between unfamiliar mini-pigs.

Míriam Marcet-Rius, Tiago Mendonça, Patrick Pageat, Sana Arroub, Cécile Bienboire-Frosini, Camille Chabaud, Eva Teruel, Alessandro Cozzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Míriam Marcet-RiusIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France. m.marcet@group-irsea.com.
Tiago MendonçaIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Patrick PageatIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Sana ArroubIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Cécile Bienboire-FrosiniIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Camille ChabaudIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Eva TeruelIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Alessandro CozziIRSEA (Research Institute in Semiochemistry and Applied Ethology), Quartier Salignan, 84400, Apt, France.
Institut de Recherche en Sémiochimie et Ethologie Appliquée · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of mixing unfamiliar pigs on farms is common but results in fighting, welfare problems and performance issues. Pigs have different ways of resolving social conflicts, including aggressive and affiliative behaviours. Synthetic appeasing pheromones have demonstrated many positive effects in animal husbandry and are regularly used by breeders to improve animal welfare and performance. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a new method of applying pig appeasing-pheromone (PAP) to the withers in an experimental model of pig mixing to determine whether PAP reduced aggression and fighting, increased prosocial behaviours, and improved behavioural and physiological indicators of welfare.

resultsPAP reduced fighting between mini-pigs (df = 1; F = 13.47; P = 0.001; mixed logistic regression). Even if not significant, agonistic behaviours tended to be reduced when the treatment was applied (df = 1; F = 4.14; P = 0.058; mixed logistic regression). Likewise, mini-pigs seemed to be scored as not aggressive at all (df = 1; F = 3.61; P = 0.070; GLMM) and to be less aggressive toward the other pig than when placebo was applied. Concerning the latency of the first contact without aggression, a significant effect was found between the PAP and placebo groups (df = 1; χ

conclusionsThe new method of applying PAP improved welfare of mini-pigs (as models of domestic pigs) by reducing fighting, among other interesting results. PAP seems thus a promising biomimetic tool to enhance animal welfare in pig production systems.

Indexed as

Agonistic behaviourAnimal welfareAppeasing pheromonesFighting in pigsMixing of pigsProsocial behavioursSalivary alpha-amylaseSalivary cortisol

Identifiers

PMID36514149
PMCPMC9749188
OpenAlexW4311301287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.