Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514102›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Association between the number of adopted implementation strategies and contextual determinants: a mixed-methods study.

Aizhan Karabukayeva, Larry R Hearld, Reena Kelly, Allyson Hall, Jasvinder Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aizhan KarabukayevaDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3201 1st Avenue North, Birmingham, AL, 35222, USA. ak1984@uab.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-4277
Larry R HearldDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3201 1st Avenue North, Birmingham, AL, 35222, USA.
Reena KellyDepartment of Health Administration & Policy, School of Health Sciences, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
Allyson HallDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3201 1st Avenue North, Birmingham, AL, 35222, USA.
Jasvinder SinghDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35222, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute SDM-2017C2-8224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe successful implementation of evidence-based innovations to improve healthcare delivery often requires a well-planned strategy to support their use. With a greater recognition of the importance of an implementation process, researchers have turned their attention to implementation strategies and their customization to target specific organizational barriers and facilitators. Further, there is a paucity of empirical evidence demonstrating the link between implementation determinants and the number of selected implementation strategies. The purpose of this mixed methods analysis is to examine how formatively assessed barriers and facilitators to implementation relate to the number and type of implementation strategies adopted to address context-specific factors.

methodsA mixed methods evaluation that included 15 rheumatology clinics throughout the United States that were planning for implementation of an evidence-based shared decision-making aid for patients with lupus. Quantitative data consisted of a count of the number of implementation strategies used by a clinic. Qualitative data collection was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and relied upon semi-structured interviews with 90 clinic members between November 2018 and August 2019.

resultsUsing the CFIR, we found that local clinic factors (Inner Setting Domain) resulted in different perceptions about Planning and Executing the DA (Process Domain); these domains were most likely to distinguish between the number and type of implementation strategies adopted by the clinics. In contrast, Intervention characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and the Outer Setting did not differentiate between the groups with different numbers of implementation strategies. The number and type of chosen strategies were not those associated with the context-specific factors.

conclusionsFindings show that, despite recognition of the value of customizing implementation strategies for the contexts in which they are applied, they are too often chosen in a manner that fail to adequately reflect the diverse settings that may present unique factors associated with implementation. Our findings also highlight the importance of the inner context - both in terms of structural characteristics and existing work processes - as a driving factor for why some organizations select different numbers and types of implementation strategies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePrimary Health CareData CollectionHumansPatientsUnited StatesCFIRDecision-aidERICImplementationImplementation strategySystematic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36514102
PMCPMC9746001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.