Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36514074›Full record

ArticleImmunity & ageing : I & A2022

Phenotypic and functional alterations of monocyte subsets with aging.

Yu Cao, Yang Fan, Fangyuan Li, Yu Hao, Yaxian Kong, Chen Chen, Xing Hao, Dannuo Han, Guoli Li, Zengtao Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Monocytes are biological sensors of aging and frailty in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Induction of dysfunctional CD14Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yu CaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Yang FanBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Fangyuan LiBiomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yu HaoBiomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yaxian KongBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Chen ChenBiomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Xing HaoCenter for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Dannuo HanCenter for Cardiac Intensive Care, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Guoli LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Zengtao WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Chuan SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China.
Junyan HanBiomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China. hanjunyan@ccmu.edu.cn.
Hui ZengBeijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China. zenghui@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been widely accepted that monocytes are one of the central mediators contributing to inflammaging. However, it remains unclear whether aged monocytes, similar to aged T cells, have characteristics of hyperactivation and increased expression of co-inhibitory molecules.

methodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from young (21-40 years old), middle-aged (41-60 years old), and older human subjects (> 60 years old). Flow cytometry was used to monitor changes in the expression of surface molecules of monocyte subsets and cytokine-producing capacity.

resultsWe observed increased tumor necrosis factor-α: TNF-α and decreased interleukin-6 (IL-6) production in monocytes from older adults compared with young and middle-aged adults. Older adults had a greater percentage of intermediate and non-classical monocyte subsets, along with increased levels of the immune activation markers human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR), and adhesion molecules cluster of differentiation molecule 11b (CD11b) and L-selectin (CD62L). Furthermore, we observed increased C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) expression on classical monocytes and decreased C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) expression on non-classical monocytes in older adult subjects. The expression of co-inhibitory receptors was reduced on monocyte subsets in older adults.

conclusionsCirculating monocytes in older adults exhibit increased expression of activation, adhesion, and migration markers, but decreased expression of co-inhibitory molecules.

Indexed as

ActivationAgingImmunosenescenceMonocytes

Identifiers

PMID36514074
PMCPMC9745938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.