Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513997›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Exploring resident experiences of person-centred care at mealtimes in long-term residential care: a rapid ethnography.

Megan Davies, Franziska Zúñiga, Hilde Verbeek, Sandra Staudacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Look at me! An exploratory study of supported eating interactions in long-term neurological care.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  7. Menu Assessment Tools Used in Residential Aged Care: A Scoping Review of Content and Quality.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Choice on the menu in residential aged care: An underrated tool for maintaining resident autonomy.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Megan DaviesNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-177X
Franziska ZúñigaNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8844-4903
Hilde VerbeekDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3740-5162
Sandra StaudacherNursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. sandra.staudacher@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-2407
University of Basel · CHBern University of Applied Sciences · CHMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor nutrition is a common ongoing problem in long-term residential care, often resulting in reduced quality of life. Previous research has concluded that the content of the meal, dining environment, service style and general atmosphere all add to the mealtime experience, suggesting that person-centred mealtimes are optimal. However, knowledge about which elements of person-centred care can be achieved in a mealtime setting in a given context is currently lacking. We aimed to understand the mealtime experience in long-term residential care by exploring (missed) opportunities for person-centred care in different settings.

methodsAs part of the TRANS-SENIOR research network, rapid ethnographies, were conducted across multiple sites (including interviews, observations and informal conversations), in a long-term residential care home in the UK, Switzerland and the Netherlands between October 2020 and December 2021. 

resultsFollowing analysis and interpretation of observations, interviews and informal conversations, the following themes were developed where either successfully achieved or missed opportunities for person-centred moments were observed: 1) considering the setting, 2) listening to and implementing resident choice, 3) enabling residents to help/care for themselves and others, 4) providing individualised care in a communal setting, and 5) knowing the person in the past and present. Residents experienced moments of participatory choice, interaction, independence and dignity, but opportunities for these were often missed due to organisational or policy constraints.

conclusionsThere are opportunities for person-centred moments during the mealtime, some of which are taken and some missed. This largely depended on the setting observed, which includes the overall environment (size of dining area, seating arrangements etc.) and allocation of staff resources, and the level of resident involvement in mealtimes, from preparation to the actual activity.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareQuality of LifeAnthropology, CulturalHumansMealsPatient-Centered CareAged CareCare homeDiningNursing homeOlder adultsQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36513997
PMCPMC9747258
OpenAlexW4311277359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.