ArticleJournal of evidence-based medicine2022
Study within a review (SWAR).
Article in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07333924 (How Can we Best Communicate the Findings of Systematic Reviews to the Public? A Study Within A Review), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
How Can we Best Communicate the Findings of Systematic Reviews to the Public? A Study Within A Review
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- Mapping Evidence on Care Interventions for People Living With Motor Neurone Disease: A Protocol for a Living Evidence and Gap Map.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- Understanding and improving compound pressures in general practice: a realist review protocol.BJGP open · 2026Article
- Sensitivity and Precision of Search Strategies Built Using a Text-Mining Word Frequency Tool (PubReMiner) Compared to Current Best Practice for Building Search Strategies: A Study Within a Review (SWAR).Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
- The inclusion or exclusion of studies based on critical appraisal results in JBI qualitative systematic reviews: An analysis of practices.Research synthesis methods · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Data Extraction With a Large Language Model: A Study Within Reviews.Annals of internal medicine · 2025Article
- From promise to practice: challenges and pitfalls in the evaluation of large language models for data extraction in evidence synthesis.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Training and Experience in Study Selection (TESS): study protocol for a pilot randomised trial within a systematic review.HRB open research · 2025Article
- Article
- Experiences of novice student team members in evidence synthesis: Study protocol for a study within a review.HRB open research · 2025Article
- Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching: a mixed methods case study within a review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- New directions beyond the boundaries of evidence synthesis.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2023Article
- Study within a review (SWAR).Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.