Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513949›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2022

Image quality assessment along the one metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system for

Ivo Rausch, Julia G Mannheim, Jürgen Kupferschläger, Christian la Fougère, Fabian P Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Total-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Whole-Body [Scientific data · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Expert consensus on workflow of PET/CT with long axial field-of-view.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterisation of a novel [EJNMMI research · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Image Quality and Quantitative PET Parameters of Low-Dose [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivo RauschQIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20/4L, 1090, Vienna, Austria. ivo.rausch@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-1669
Julia G MannheimWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jürgen KupferschlägerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Otfried-Mueller-Strasse 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian la FougèreCluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian P SchmidtWerner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany. F.schmidt@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 445471454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimRecently, total-body PET/CT systems with an extended axial field-of-view (aFOV) became commercially available which allow acquiring physiologic information of multiple organs simultaneously. However, the nominal aFOV may clinically not be used effectively due to the inherently reduced sensitivity at the distal ends of the aFOV. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of the useful aFOV of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system.

methodsA NEMA image quality (IQ) phantom mimicking a standard [

resultsImage noise and contrast were stable within the central 80 cm of the aFOV. Outside this central area, image contrast variability as well as image noise increased. This degradation of IQ was in particular evident for short acquisition times of less than 30 s. At 10 min acquisition time and in the absence of post-reconstruction filtering, the useful aFOV was 100 cm. For a 2 min acquisition time, a useful aFOV with image noise below 15% was only achievable using Gaussian filtering with axial extents of between 83 and 103 cm when going from 2 to 6 mm full-width-half-maximum, respectively.

conclusionImage noise increases substantially towards the ends of the aFOV. However, good IQ in compliance with generally accepted benchmarks is achievable for an aFOV of > 90 cm. When accepting higher image noise or using dedicated protocol settings such as stronger filtering a useful aFOV of around 1 m can be achieved for a 2 min acquisition time.

Indexed as

Biograph Vision QuadraExtended axial FOVImage qualityTotal-body PET

Identifiers

PMID36513949
PMCPMC9747988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.