Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513860›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2022

Challenges and Strategies for Solubility Measurements and Dissolution Method Development for Amorphous Solid Dispersion Formulations.

Andre Hermans, Johanna Milsmann, Hanlin Li, Christian Jede, Andrea Moir, Bart Hens, James Morgado, Tian Wu, Michael Cohen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andre HermansAnalytical Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA. andre_hermans@merck.com.
Johanna MilsmannAnalytical Development, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Hanlin LiTechnical Operations, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christian JedeAnalytical Development, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany.
Andrea MoirOral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Bart HensDrug Product Design, Pfizer UK, Sandwich, UK.
James MorgadoAnalytical R&D, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Tian WuAffaMed Therapeutics Inc., Sacramento, California, USA.
Michael CohenGlobal Chemistry and Manufacturing Controls, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript represents the view of the Dissolution Working Group of the IQ Consortium on the challenges of and recommendations on solubility measurements and development of dissolution methods for immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms formulated with amorphous solid dispersions. Nowadays, numerous compounds populate the industrial pipeline as promising drug candidates yet suffer from low aqueous solubility. In the oral drug product development process, solubility along with permeability is a key determinant to assure sufficient drug absorption along the intestinal tract. Formulating the drug candidate as an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) is one potential option to address this issue. These formulations demonstrate the rapid onset of drug dissolution and can achieve supersaturated concentrations, which poses significant challenges to appropriately characterize solubility and develop quality control dissolution methods. This review strives to categorize the different dissolution and solubility challenges for ASD associated with 3 different topics: (i) definition of solubility and sink conditions for ASD dissolution, (ii) applications and development of non-sink dissolution (according to conventional definition) for ASD formulation screening and QC method development, and (iii) the advantages and disadvantages of using dissolution in detecting crystallinity in ASD formulations. Related to these challenges, successful examples of dissolution experiments in the context of control strategies are shared and may lead as an example for scientific consensus concerning dissolution testing of ASD.

Indexed as

SolubilityCrystallizationDrug LiberationAmorphous solid dispersionsCrystallizationDissolutionSolubility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.