Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513764›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Heating of Large Endovascular Stents and Stent Grafts in Magnetic Particle Imaging-Influence of Measurement Parameters and Isocenter Distance.

Franz Wegner, Anselm von Gladiss, Huimin Wei, André Behrends, Ulrike Grzyska, Malte M Sieren, Julian Haegele, Matthias Graeser, Thorsten M Buzug, Joerg Barkhausen and 1 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bare-Metal Stent Tracking with Magnetic Particle Imaging.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Franz WegnerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. franz.wegner@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-3428
Anselm von GladissInstitute for Computational Visualistics, University of Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstraße 1, 56070, Koblenz, Germany.
Huimin WeiInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
André BehrendsFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering IMTE, Mönkhofer Weg 239a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Ulrike GrzyskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Malte M SierenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Julian HaegeleZentrum für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Von-Werth-Straße 5, 41515, Grevenbroich, Germany.
Matthias GraeserFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering IMTE, Mönkhofer Weg 239a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Thorsten M BuzugInstitute of Medical Engineering, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Joerg BarkhausenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas FriedrichFraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering IMTE, Mönkhofer Weg 239a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Fraunhofer Research Institution for Individualized and Cell-Based Medical Engineering · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · DEUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DEUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DE

Funding

University of Lübeck, Clinician Scientist Program CS10-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a tomographic imaging modality with the potential for cardiovascular applications. In this context, the extent to which stents are heated should be estimated from safety perspective. Furthermore, the influence of the measurement parameters and stent distance to the isocenter of the MPI scanner on stent heating were evaluated. MATERIALS AND

methodsNine different endovascular stents and stent grafts were tested in polyvinyl-chloride tubes. The stents had diameters from 10 to 31 mm, lengths between 25 and 100 mm and were made from stainless steel, nitinol or cobalt-chromium. The temperature differences were recorded with fiber-optic thermometers. All measurements were performed in a preclinical commercial MPI scanner. The measurement parameters were varied (drive field strengths: 3, 6, 9, 12 mT and selection field gradients: 0, 1.25 and 2.5 T/m). Furthermore, measurements with different distances to the scanner's isocenter were performed (100 to 0 mm).

resultsAll stents showed heating (maximum 53.1 K, minimum 4.6 K). The stent diameter directly correlated with the temperature increase. The drive field strength influenced the heating of the stents, whereas the selection field gradient had no detectable impact. The heating of the stents decreased with increasing distance from the scanner's isocenter and thus correlated with the loss of the scanner's magnetic field.

conclusionStents can cause potentially harmful heating in MPI. In addition to the stent diameter and design, the drive field strength and the distance to the MPI scanner's isocenter must be kept in mind as influencing parameters.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresHeatingStentsTomographyEndovascular Aneurysm RepairHumansMagnetic PhenomenaHeatingMagnetic particle imagingSafetyStents

Identifiers

PMID36513764
PMCPMC10014652
OpenAlexW4311271607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.