Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513729›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2022

Autoencoders for sample size estimation for fully connected neural network classifiers.

Faris F Gulamali, Ashwin S Sawant, Patricia Kovatch, Benjamin Glicksberg, Alexander Charney, Girish N Nadkarni, Eric Oermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Faris F GulamaliIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA. faris.gulamali@icahn.mssm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2973-6594
Ashwin S SawantIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-8541
Patricia KovatchIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-1742
Benjamin GlicksbergIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-8090
Alexander CharneyIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Girish N NadkarniIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-4314
Eric OermannNew York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample size estimation is a crucial step in experimental design but is understudied in the context of deep learning. Currently, estimating the quantity of labeled data needed to train a classifier to a desired performance, is largely based on prior experience with similar models and problems or on untested heuristics. In many supervised machine learning applications, data labeling can be expensive and time-consuming and would benefit from a more rigorous means of estimating labeling requirements. Here, we study the problem of estimating the minimum sample size of labeled training data necessary for training computer vision models as an exemplar for other deep learning problems. We consider the problem of identifying the minimal number of labeled data points to achieve a generalizable representation of the data, a minimum converging sample (MCS). We use autoencoder loss to estimate the MCS for fully connected neural network classifiers. At sample sizes smaller than the MCS estimate, fully connected networks fail to distinguish classes, and at sample sizes above the MCS estimate, generalizability strongly correlates with the loss function of the autoencoder. We provide an easily accessible, code-free, and dataset-agnostic tool to estimate sample sizes for fully connected networks. Taken together, our findings suggest that MCS and convergence estimation are promising methods to guide sample size estimates for data collection and labeling prior to training deep learning models in computer vision.

Identifiers

PMID36513729
PMCPMC9747810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.