ArticleScientific reports2022
A few-shot approach for COVID-19 screening in standard and portable chest X-ray images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuberculosis detection using few shot learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-task localization of the hemidiaphragms and lung segmentation in portable chest X-ray images of COVID-19 patients.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and effective diagnostic systems are of vital importance for COVID-19, specifically for triage and screening procedures. In this work, a fully automatic diagnostic system based on chest X-ray images (CXR) has been proposed. It relies on the few-shot paradigm, which allows to work with small databases. Furthermore, three components have been added to improve the diagnosis performance: (1) a region proposal network which makes the system focus on the lungs; (2) a novel cost function which adds expert knowledge by giving specific penalties to each misdiagnosis; and (3) an ensembling procedure integrating multiple image comparisons to produce more reliable diagnoses. Moreover, the COVID-SC dataset has been introduced, comprising almost 1100 AnteroPosterior CXR images, namely 439 negative and 653 positive according to the RT-PCR test. Expert radiologists divided the negative images into three categories (normal lungs, COVID-related diseases, and other diseases) and the positive images into four severity levels. This entails the most complete COVID-19 dataset in terms of patient diversity. The proposed system has been compared with state-of-the-art methods in the COVIDGR-1.0 public database, achieving the highest accuracy (81.13% ± 2.76%) and the most robust results. An ablation study proved that each system component contributes to improve the overall performance. The procedure has also been validated on the COVID-SC dataset under different scenarios, with accuracies ranging from 70.81 to 87.40%. In conclusion, our proposal provides a good accuracy appropriate for the early detection of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.