Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

How, where and when to screen for porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) in donor pigs for xenotransplantation.

S Halecker, S Hansen, L Krabben, F Ebner, B Kaufer, J Denner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hypoimmune platforms: from rejection to immune evasion and regulatory implications.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differences between xenotransplantation and allogeneic kidney transplantation: the current situation and future challenges in Japan.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How Does a Porcine Herpesvirus, PCMV/PRV, Induce a Xenozoonosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Role of a Porcine Herpesvirus, PCMV/PRV, in Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S HaleckerInstitute of Virology, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
S HansenInstitute of Virology, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
L KrabbenInstitute of Virology, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
F EbnerInstitute of Immunology, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
B KauferInstitute of Virology, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
J DennerInstitute of Virology, Free University, Berlin, Germany. Joachim.Denner@fu-berlin.de.
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), that is actually a porcine roseolovirus (PRV), is a common herpesvirus in domestic pigs and wild boars. In xenotransplantation, PCMV/PRV has been shown to significantly reduce the survival time of pig kidneys and hearts in preclinical trials with different non-human primates. Furthermore, PCMV/PRV has been transmitted in the first pig to human heart xenotransplantation and contributed to the death of the patient. Although transmitted to the recipient, there is no evidence that PCMV/PRV can infect primate cells including human cells. PCMV/PRV is closely related to the human herpesviruses 6 and 7, and only distantly related to the human CMV (HCMV). Antiviral drugs used for the treatment of HCMV are less effective against PCMV/PRV. However, there are well described strategies to eliminate the virus from pig facilities. In order to detect the virus and to eliminate it, highly sensitive detection methods and the knowledge of how, where and when to screen the donor pigs is required. Here, a comparative testing of organs from pigs of different ages using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based and immunological methods was performed. Testing young piglets, PCMV/PRV was detected effectively by PCR in blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, tonsils and heart. In adult animals, detection by PCR was not successful in most cases, because the virus load was below the detection limit or the virus was in its latent stage. Therefore, detection of antibodies against selected recombinant proteins corresponding to epitopes detected by nearly all infected animals in a Western blot assay is advantageous. By contrast, immunological testing is not beneficial in young animals as piglets might have PCMV/PRV-specific antibodies obtained from their infected mother via the colostrum. Using a thoughtful combination of PCR-based and immunological methods, detection of PCMV/PRV in donor pigs for xenotransplantation is feasible and a controlled elimination of the virus by early weaning or other methods is possible.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsSwine DiseasesAnimalsCytomegalovirusHumansPrimatesSwineTissue DonorsTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID36513687
PMCPMC9747970
OpenAlexW4311243632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.