Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513681›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Revenue loss due to whale entanglement mitigation and fishery closures.

Rachel Seary, Jarrod A Santora, Desiree Tommasi, Andrew Thompson, Steven J Bograd, Kate Richerson, Stephanie Brodie, Dan Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel SearyInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. rachel.seary@noaa.gov.
Jarrod A SantoraFisheries Ecology Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Desiree TommasiInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Andrew ThompsonFisheries Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, San Diego, CA, USA.
Steven J BogradInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Kate RichersonFishery Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Newport Field Station, 2032 S.E. OSU Drive, Newport, OR, 97365, USA.
Stephanie BrodieInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Dan HollandConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Blvd E., Seattle, WA, 98112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whale entanglements with fishing gear, exacerbated by changing environmental conditions, pose significant risk to whale populations. Management tools used to reduce entanglement risk, for example temporary area restrictions on fishing, can have negative economic consequences for fishing communities. Balancing whale protection with sustaining productive fisheries is therefore a challenge experienced worldwide. In the California Current Ecosystem, ecosystem indicators have been used to understand the environmental dynamics that lead to increased whale entanglement risk in a lucrative crab fishery. However, an assessment of socio-economic risk for this fishery, as in many other regions, is missing. We estimate retrospectively the losses from ex-vessel revenue experienced by commercial Dungeness crab fishers in California during two seasons subject to whale entanglement mitigation measures using a Linear-Cragg hurdle modeling approach which incorporated estimates of pre-season crab abundance. In the 2020 fishing season, our results suggest total revenues would have been $14.4 million higher in the Central Management Area of California in the absence of closures and other disturbances. In the 2019 fishing season, our results suggest ex-vessel revenues would have been $9.4 million higher in the Central Management Area and $0.3 million higher in the Northern Management Area. Our evaluation should motivate the development of strategies which maximize whale protection whilst promoting productive, sustainable and economically-viable fisheries.

Indexed as

BrachyuraFisheriesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemRetrospective StudiesSeasonsWhales

Identifiers

PMID36513681
PMCPMC9746587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.