Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513664›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Deep brain stimulation creates informational lesion through membrane depolarization in mouse hippocampus.

Eric Lowet, Krishnakanth Kondabolu, Samuel Zhou, Rebecca A Mount, Yangyang Wang, Cara R Ravasio, Xue Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric LowetBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. elowet@mailfence.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9793-0639
Krishnakanth KondaboluBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Samuel ZhouBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6077-4743
Rebecca A MountBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-1641
Yangyang WangBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Cara R RavasioBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Xue HanBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. xuehan@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3896-4609
Boston University · US

Funding

Unveiling the mechanisms of ultrasound neuromodulation via spatially confined stimulation and temporally resolved recordingR01NS109794 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHENG, JI-XIN, HAN, XUE · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Voltage Imaging Analysis of Striatal Network Dynamics Related to Movement, Parkinson's Disease and Deep Brain StimulationR01NS115797 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HAN, XUE · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109794NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising neuromodulation therapy, but the neurophysiological mechanisms of DBS remain unclear. In awake mice, we performed high-speed membrane voltage fluorescence imaging of individual hippocampal CA1 neurons during DBS delivered at 40 Hz or 140 Hz, free of electrical interference. DBS powerfully depolarized somatic membrane potentials without suppressing spike rate, especially at 140 Hz. Further, DBS paced membrane voltage and spike timing at the stimulation frequency and reduced timed spiking output in response to hippocampal network theta-rhythmic (3-12 Hz) activity patterns. To determine whether DBS directly impacts cellular processing of inputs, we optogenetically evoked theta-rhythmic membrane depolarization at the soma. We found that DBS-evoked membrane depolarization was correlated with DBS-mediated suppression of neuronal responses to optogenetic inputs. These results demonstrate that DBS produces powerful membrane depolarization that interferes with the ability of individual neurons to respond to inputs, creating an informational lesion.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsHippocampusMembrane PotentialsMiceNeuronsTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID36513664
PMCPMC9748039
OpenAlexW4311373018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.