Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36513609›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research2023

Zika virus as a cause of birth defects: Were the teratogenic effects of Zika virus missed for decades?

Rachel K Gilbert, Lyle R Petersen, Margaret A Honein, Cynthia A Moore, Sonja A Rasmussen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Review of the Recent Epidemiology of Zika Virus Infection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Review
  4. Strain-specific quantification ofFrontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  5. A Review of Emerging Viral Pathogens and Current Concerns for Vertical Transmission of Infection.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Virus as Teratogenic Agents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel K GilbertUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Lyle R PetersenDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Margaret A HoneinDivision of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Cynthia A MooreNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4224-2692
Sonja A RasmussenDepartments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-4928
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) was identified as a teratogen in 2016 when an increase in severe microcephaly and other brain defects was observed in fetuses and newborns following outbreaks in French Polynesia (2013-2014) and Brazil (2015-2016) and among travelers to other countries experiencing outbreaks. Some have questioned why ZIKV was not recognized as a teratogen before these outbreaks: whether novel genetic changes in ZIKV had increased its teratogenicity or whether its association with birth defects had previously been undetected. Here we examine the evidence for these two possibilities. We describe evidence for specific mutations that arose before the French Polynesia outbreak that might have increased ZIKV teratogenicity. We also present information on children born with findings consistent with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) as early as 2009 and epidemiological evidence that suggests increases in CZS-type birth defects before 2013. We also explore reasons why a link between ZIKV and birth defects might have been missed, including issues with surveillance of ZIKV infections and of birth defects, challenges to ZIKV diagnostic testing, and the susceptibility of different populations to ZIKV infection at the time of pregnancy. Although it is not possible to prove definitively that ZIKV had teratogenic properties before 2013, several pieces of evidence support the hypothesis that its teratogenicity had been missed in the past. These findings emphasize the need for further investments in global surveillance for emerging infections and for birth defects so that infectious teratogens can be identified more expeditiously in the future.

Indexed as

MicrocephalyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousTeratogenesisZika VirusZika Virus InfectionChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyTeratogensTeratogensbirth defectscongenital Zika syndromesurveillanceteratogenZika virus

Identifiers

PMID36513609
PMCPMC10552063
OpenAlexW4311307710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.