ReviewBirth defects research2023
Zika virus as a cause of birth defects: Were the teratogenic effects of Zika virus missed for decades?
Review in Birth defects research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preexisting yellow fever virus and West Nile virus immunity and pregnancy outcomes in a Nigerian cohort with endemic orthoflavivirus exposure.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Cytochrome P450 and esterase genes associated with permethrin resistance in Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762).Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- A Review of the Recent Epidemiology of Zika Virus Infection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Review
- Strain-specific quantification ofFrontiers in insect science · 2025Article
- A Review of Emerging Viral Pathogens and Current Concerns for Vertical Transmission of Infection.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Zika viruses encode 5' upstream open reading frames affecting infection of human brain cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Understanding the multidimensional neurodevelopmental outcomes in children after congenital Zika virus exposure.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Virus as Teratogenic Agents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Editorial: Community series - innovative approaches in diagnosis of emerging/re-emerging infectious diseases, volume II.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) was identified as a teratogen in 2016 when an increase in severe microcephaly and other brain defects was observed in fetuses and newborns following outbreaks in French Polynesia (2013-2014) and Brazil (2015-2016) and among travelers to other countries experiencing outbreaks. Some have questioned why ZIKV was not recognized as a teratogen before these outbreaks: whether novel genetic changes in ZIKV had increased its teratogenicity or whether its association with birth defects had previously been undetected. Here we examine the evidence for these two possibilities. We describe evidence for specific mutations that arose before the French Polynesia outbreak that might have increased ZIKV teratogenicity. We also present information on children born with findings consistent with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) as early as 2009 and epidemiological evidence that suggests increases in CZS-type birth defects before 2013. We also explore reasons why a link between ZIKV and birth defects might have been missed, including issues with surveillance of ZIKV infections and of birth defects, challenges to ZIKV diagnostic testing, and the susceptibility of different populations to ZIKV infection at the time of pregnancy. Although it is not possible to prove definitively that ZIKV had teratogenic properties before 2013, several pieces of evidence support the hypothesis that its teratogenicity had been missed in the past. These findings emphasize the need for further investments in global surveillance for emerging infections and for birth defects so that infectious teratogens can be identified more expeditiously in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.