ArticlePloS one2022
Categorization of tinnitus listeners with a focus on cochlear synaptopathy.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic architecture distinguishes tinnitus from hearing loss.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Deafferentation in Humans.Trends in hearingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tinnitus is a complex and not yet fully understood phenomenon. Often the treatments provided are effective only for subgroups of sufferers. We are presently not able to predict benefit with the currently available diagnostic tools and analysis methods. Being able to identify and specifically treat sub-categories of tinnitus would help develop and implement more targeted treatments with higher success rate. In this study we use a clustering analysis based on 17 predictors to cluster an audiologically homogeneous group of normal hearing participants, both with and without tinnitus. The predictors have been chosen to be either tinnitus-specific measures or measures that are thought to be connected to cochlear synaptopathy. Our aim was to identify a subgroup of participants with characteristics consistent with the current hypothesized impact of cochlear synaptopathy. Our results show that this approach can separate the listeners into different clusters. But not in all cases could the tinnitus sufferers be separated from the control group. Another challenge is the use of categorical measures which seem to dominate the importance analysis of the factors. The study showed that data-driven clustering of a homogeneous listener group based on a mixed set of experimental outcome measures is a promising tool for tinnitus sub-typing, with the caveat that sample sizes might need to be sufficiently high, and higher than in the present study, to keep a meaningful sample size after clustering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.