Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36512397›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Spinal premotor interneurons controlling antagonistic muscles are spatially intermingled.

Remi Ronzano, Sophie Skarlatou, Bianca K Barriga, B Anne Bannatyne, Gardave Singh Bhumbra, Joshua D Foster, Jeffrey D Moore, Camille Lancelin, Amanda M Pocratsky, Mustafa Görkem Özyurt and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spinal circuits encode a map of the trunk to control skin twitches.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A cholinergic spinal pathway for the adaptive control of breathing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Motor Circuit Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Remi Ronzano *Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4927-9474
Sophie Skarlatou *Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Bianca K Barriga *Gene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
B Anne Bannatyne *Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gardave Singh Bhumbra *Department of Neuroscience Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joshua D FosterDepartment of Neuroscience Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey D MooreHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
Camille LancelinDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda M PocratskyDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mustafa Görkem ÖzyurtDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Calvin Chad SmithDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew J ToddInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3007-6749
David J MaxwellInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew J MurraySainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Samuel L PfaffGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2142-166X
Robert M BrownstoneDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-2725
Niccolò ZampieriMax Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2228-9453
Marco BeatoDepartment of Neuroscience Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-8318

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
Spinal Circuits for the Control of Dextrous MovementU19NS112959 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D · 2019 to 2023
$14.3M
Characterization of spinal circuits underlying motor synergy functionR01NS123160 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI PFAFF, SAMUEL L. · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Descending engagement of brainstem neuronal circuits that govern orofacial motor behaviorsK99HD096512 · NICHD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, JEFFREY DANIEL · 2018 to 2019
$179k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L001454Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S005943/1Medical Research Council MR/R011494/1NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD096512NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123160NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112959Wellcome Trust 110193Wellcome Trust 110193/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 225674Wellcome Trust 225674/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elaborate behaviours are produced by tightly controlled flexor-extensor motor neuron activation patterns. Motor neurons are regulated by a network of interneurons within the spinal cord, but the computational processes involved in motor control are not fully understood. The neuroanatomical arrangement of motor and premotor neurons into topographic patterns related to their controlled muscles is thought to facilitate how information is processed by spinal circuits. Rabies retrograde monosynaptic tracing has been used to label premotor interneurons innervating specific motor neuron pools, with previous studies reporting topographic mediolateral positional biases in flexor and extensor premotor interneurons. To more precisely define how premotor interneurons contacting specific motor pools are organized, we used multiple complementary viral-tracing approaches in mice to minimize systematic biases associated with each method. Contrary to expectations, we found that premotor interneurons contacting motor pools controlling flexion and extension of the ankle are highly intermingled rather than segregated into specific domains like motor neurons. Thus, premotor spinal neurons controlling different muscles process motor instructions in the absence of clear spatial patterns among the flexor-extensor circuit components.

Indexed as

InterneuronsMusclesSpinal CordAnimalsMiceMotor NeuronsRabiesextensor musclesflexor musclesmouseneurosciencepremotor interneuronsrabies viral tracingspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID36512397
PMCPMC9844990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.