ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023
Embryo Blastomere Exclusion Identified in a Time-Lapse Culture System Is Associated with Embryo Ploidy.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developmental perturbation in human embryos: Clinical and biological significance learned from time-lapse images.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined blastomere exclusion which is seen during embryo development and could represent imperfect cell division or a mechanism of aneuploidy correction. This was a retrospective cohort study which included embryos cultured in a time-lapse incubator undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with trophectoderm biopsy. Embryos were evaluated for blastomere exclusion early in development, late in development, both, or neither. Blastomere exclusion was compared to embryo ploidy. Embryos with no blastomere exclusion had an aneuploidy rate of 52.9%, while embryos displaying blastomere exclusion at any stage had an aneuploidy rate of 68.5% (p < .001). Early blastomere exclusion was not significantly associated with an increased aneuploidy risk (59.2% vs. 52.9% in no blastomere exclusions; p = 0.22). However, embryos with late blastomere exclusion were significantly more likely to be aneuploid, compared to embryos with no blastomere exclusions (77.5% vs. 52.9%; p < 0.001) as were embryos with both early + late blastomere exclusions (71.2% vs. 52.9%; p < 0.001). Upon restricting the analysis to aneuploid embryos, the presence of any blastomere exclusion was not significantly associated with complex aneuploidy, defined as 2 more affected chromosomes (43.9% vs. 38.7%; p = 0.28). However, the proportion with adverse embryo genetics significantly increased with the timing of blastomere exclusion (38.7%, 37%, 45.5%, and 50% for none, early, late, and early + late; p = 0.043). Late blastomere exclusion or a combination of both early + late blastomere exclusion was associated with an increased risk of aneuploid embryo genetics. Embryo selection using time-lapse culture systems should incorporate these findings when untested embryos are transferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36512191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.