Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36512165›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2023

JAK inhibitors, cardiovascular and thromboembolic events: what we know and what we would like to know.

Gerasimos Evangelatos, George E Fragoulis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Selective JAK-Inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gerasimos EvangelatosJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, First Department of Propedeutic and Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75 Str, 11527, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-3093
George E FragoulisJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, First Department of Propedeutic and Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75 Str, 11527, Athens, Greece. geofragoul@yahoo.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-7023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have been approved for several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and non-radiographic axSpA. Although they have been proved to be very effective, some safety concerns have emerged. These mainly pertain to their profile regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as well as to thromboembolic events (VTEs). In fact, there are accumulating data showing that the concerns might be greater for the latter. Herein, we provide a critical analysis of the so far published major studies, discussing also some thoughts (e.g., different VTE risk across IMIDs) that could be taken into account in the interpretation of these results. In addition, we highlight the need for assessment of patients' profile for cardiovascular as well as for thromboembolic risk factors. Incorporation of the respective tools (that need further validation) should be considered in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidJanus Kinase InhibitorsHumansImmunomodulating AgentsRisk FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorsDeep vein thrombosisJAK-inhibitorsMACEPulmonary embolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.