Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511762›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2023

Microbiome resilience of Amazonian forests: Agroforest divergence to bacteria and secondary forest succession convergence to fungi.

Márcio Fernandes Alves Leite, Binbin Liu, Ernesto Gómez Cardozo, Hulda Rocha E Silva, Ronildson Lima Luz, Karol Henry Mavisoy Muchavisoy, Flávio Henrique Reis Moraes, Guillaume Xavier Rousseau, George Kowalchuk, Christoph Gehring and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Márcio Fernandes Alves LeiteDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4943-2213
Binbin LiuCenter for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5791-1046
Ernesto Gómez CardozoAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-4106
Hulda Rocha E SilvaAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-0978
Ronildson Lima LuzAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7253-0583
Karol Henry Mavisoy MuchavisoyAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-9866
Flávio Henrique Reis MoraesAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-4278
Guillaume Xavier RousseauAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2482-4376
George KowalchukEcology and Biodiversity, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3866-0832
Christoph GehringAgroecology Program of Maranhão State University (UEMA), São Luís, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-4397
Eiko Eurya KuramaeDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology NIOO-KNAW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-8668

Funding

Brazilian Council of Higher Education A080/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An alarming and increasing deforestation rate threatens Amazon tropical ecosystems and subsequent degradation due to frequent fires. Agroforestry systems (AFS) may offer a sustainable alternative, reportedly mimicking the plant-soil interactions of the natural mature forest (MF). However, the role of microbial community in tropical AFS remains largely unknown. This knowledge is crucial for evaluating the sustainability of AFS and practices given the key role of microbes in the aboveground-belowground interactions. The current study, by comparing different AFS and successions of secondary and MFs, showed that AFS fostered distinct groups of bacterial community, diverging from the MFs, likely a result of management practices while secondary forests converged to the same soil microbiome found in the MF, by favoring the same groups of fungi. Model simulations reveal that AFS would require profound changes in aboveground biomass and in soil factors to reach the same microbiome found in MFs. In summary, AFS practices did not result in ecosystems mimicking natural forest plant-soil interactions but rather reshaped the ecosystem to a completely different relation between aboveground biomass, soil abiotic properties, and the soil microbiome.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaBacteriaForestsFungiSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilaboveground-belowground interactionsforest regrowthhomegardenland-use changesslash-and-burn agriculturesoil microbiometropical rainforest

Identifiers

PMID36511762
PMCPMC10108277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.