Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511648›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Efficacy of lidocaine local anesthesia on pain perception during amniocentesis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ebraheem Albazee, Reem Sayad, Mohammad Alnifise, Abdulrahman Al-Anzi, Faisal Alshammari, Gheith Rasheed, Ahmed Samy, Haifa Al-Jundy, Marwah Ghazi Bintalib, Ahmed Abu-Zaid

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ebraheem AlbazeeKuwait Institute for Medical Specializations (KIMS), Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-7769
Reem SayadFaculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-2714
Mohammad AlnifiseFaculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-518X
Abdulrahman Al-AnziFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-4778-9921
Faisal AlshammariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jahra Hospital, Jahra, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0001-5996-3811
Gheith RasheedFaculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-0678-3213
Ahmed SamyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0150-828X
Haifa Al-JundyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-749X
Marwah Ghazi BintalibDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9761-2342
Ahmed Abu-ZaidCollege of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2286-2181
Hashemite University · JOAssiut University · EGCairo University · EGJahra Hospital · KWJordan University of Science and Technology · JOKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKuwait Institute for Medical Specialization · KWUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine local analgesia on maternal pain reduction during amniocentesis. Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases were screened from inception and updated in July 2022. The included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated for the risk of bias via the Cochrane tool. The primary outcome was pain perception using the 10 cm visual analog scale, and was summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the mode of administration. Meta-analysis was done via Review Manager software. We included five RCTs totaling 1004 women (lidocaine arm n=502 patients and control arm n=502 patients). Overall, there was no significant difference between both arms [MD=-0.21, 95% CI (-0.48, 0.07), p=0.80]. The pooled analysis showed homogeneity (p=0.13, I2=43%). Subgroup analysis according to the mode of administration showed that pain perception did not significantly differ between both arms when lidocaine was employed as injection [n=3 RCTs, MD=-0.26, 95% CI (-0.76, 0.23), p=0.29] or non-injection [n=2 RCTs, MD=-0.18, 95% CI (-0.55, 0.18), p=0.33]. The pooled analyses showed heterogeneity (p=0.05, I2=66%) and homogeneity (p=0.27, I2=19%), respectively. There was no noteworthy change concerning maternal pain perception between the lidocaine and control arms. Most women reported just minimal discomfort during amniocentesis. Counseling should educate patients that the pain they might experience during amniocentesis is comparable to venous blood sampling.

Indexed as

Amniocentesisanalgesialocal anesthesiapainpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36511648
PMCPMC9748856
OpenAlexW4311318215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.