Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511494›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2022

Translation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Postoperative Recovery Score QoR-15: A Multi-Centred Cohort Study.

Onur Selvi, Mustafa Azizoğlu, Gülhan Temel, Serkan Tulgar, Ahish Chitneni, Ece Nur Çınar, Zeliha Özer, Yavuz Gürkan

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05965544 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Application of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) Before or After Spinal Anesthesia on QoR-15 Score in Partial Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaşakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Anesthesia, Local, Fracture of Hip, QoR-15ArmsBupivacain (preoperative), Bupivacaine-fentanyl, Bupivacain (Postoperative)
NCT06753240 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Plane Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

TypeobservationalSponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled63ConditionsLaparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, Quality of Recovery (QoR-15), Postoperative Analgesia, Regional Anesthesia
NCT07115771 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Adductor Canal Block on Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsTotal Knee AnthroplastyArmsPostoperative analgesia management
NCT07410000 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsPain Management, Total Hip ArthroplastyArmsQuadro-Iliac Plane (QIP) Block, Sham Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Onur SelviDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Cambridge University Addebrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mustafa AzizoğluDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.
Gülhan TemelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.
Serkan TulgarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahish ChitneniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, A.T Still University in Arizona (SOMA), Arizona, USA.
Ece Nur ÇınarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, West Middlesex Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Zeliha ÖzerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Yavuz GürkanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Koç University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mersin Üniversitesi · TRAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBA.T. Still University · USKoç University · TRMaltepe University · TRSamsun University · TRWest Middlesex University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire is a self-rated questionnaire used to assess the quality of the postoperative recovery and health status of patients in the early period following surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15.

methodsAfter approval by the Maltepe University local ethics committee, this observational study was conducted among patients who received surgical interventions at Mersin University Hospital between July 2019 and January 2020. Reliability, feasibility, and validity were assessed to validate the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15.

resultsThe completion rate of the form was determined to be 92% and a total of 200 patients were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach's alpha of the global Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15 was 0.927. Test-retest reliability was 0.84 [CI 95%: 0.75-0.90] and Cohen's effect size was 0.319. The total standardized response mean was determined as 0.53.

conclusionsThis is the first study in which the Quality of Recovery-15 scale was translated into Turkish with our knowledge. The Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15 showed satisfactory reliability and validity in evaluating the quality of recovery after surgery in the Turkish population.

Identifiers

PMID36511494
PMCPMC9885813
OpenAlexW4310920210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.