Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511490›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2022

Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Change the Anaesthesia Preferences of Pregnant Women for Caesarean Section?

Muhammet Korkusuz, Tayfun Et

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammet KorkusuzDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Karaman, Turkey.
Tayfun EtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Karaman, Turkey.
Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 disease has become a new cause of anxiety for pregnant women regarding caesarean sections. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the anaesthesia preferences of pregnant women who preferred general anaesthesia in their previous caesarean sections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA total of 140 pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45, who had undergone elective caesarean section under general anaesthesia, were included in the study. Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale and Beck Anxiety Inventory were applied. The primary cause of anxiety and anaesthesia preference was asked and recorded.

resultsIt was found that 50.7% (71/140) of the pregnant women who preferred general anaesthesia in their previous caesarean sections preferred regional anaesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was also found that patients with primary anxiety because of COVID-19 contagion preferred regional anaesthesia more (36/55), and the primary reason for anxiety in these patients was COVID-19 contamination anxiety (36/71).

conclusionsInforming the patients about the pandemic precautions in the surgery room and in the hospital during the pandemic, as well as routine information in the preoperative anaesthesia appointment, may be effective in the choice of regional anaesthesia, which is considered to have a low risk of transmission.

Identifiers

PMID36511490
PMCPMC9885785
OpenAlexW4310920108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.