ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2022
Estimating the Outcomes of Intracerebral Haemorrhage with Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II Score: A Multicentre Study.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSpontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage causes mortality or leads to permanent disability in most of the survivors. Thus, determining the severity of the disease to predict mortality and morbidity is important. This study aimed to evaluate Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II and Intracerebral Haemorrhage scores in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage patients treated in intensive care units.
methodsThis multicenter study was conducted in 2 tertiary care hospitals' general intensive care units. Short- (in-hospital) and long-term (1-year) mortality and functional outcomes at discharge were evaluated using the Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II scores.
resultsOf the 35 spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage patients analysed, the modified Ranking Scale was <4 in 10 (28.6%) patients and ≥4 in 25 (71.4%) patients. The in-hospital mortality was 51.4%, and 1-year mortality was 60%. The discriminative power of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II was excellent (area under the curve ≥0.9), and Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score was fair (area under the curve ≥0.7) for both in-hospital mortality and poor outcomes at discharge. The area under the curve of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II was significantly higher than the area under the curve of Intracerebral Haemorrhage score.
conclusionAcute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score is a better model with high sensitivity and specificity than the Intracerebral Haemorrhage score in predicting the in-hospital mortality and functional outcomes at the discharge of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage patients. However, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score lacks the neuroradiologic features that are crucial for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Therefore, the Intracerebral Haemorrhage score can be used as an indicator of neurological status combined with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score rather than as a predictive model of outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.