Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511414›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world.

Anna M Rzepka, Kieran J Hussey, Margaret V Maltz, Karsten Babin, Laurie M Wilcox, Jody C Culham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. New Approaches to 3D Vision.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna M RzepkaNeuroscience Program, University of Western Ontario, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7.
Kieran J HusseyNeuroscience Program, University of Western Ontario, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7.
Margaret V MaltzDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7.
Karsten BabinDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7.
Laurie M WilcoxDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3.
Jody C CulhamNeuroscience Program, University of Western Ontario, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, London, ON, Canada N6A 3K7.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-2999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of virtual reality (VR) as a tool for perceptual and cognitive research rests on the assumption that perception in virtual environments generalizes to the real world. Here, we conducted two experiments to compare size and distance perception between VR and physical reality (Maltz

Indexed as

Virtual RealityCuesDepth PerceptionDistance PerceptionHumansVision, Binocularbinocular visiondistance perceptionfamiliar size effecthead-mounted displaysize perceptionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36511414
PMCPMC9745877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.