Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511136›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2022

The Italian consensus conference on psychological therapies for anxiety and depressive disorders: findings and recommendations.

Angelo Barbato, Gioia Bottesi, Massimo Biondi, Mariangela Corbo, Giovanni de Girolamo, Gerardo Favaretto, Silvio Garattini, Paolo Migone, Paolo Moderato, Emiliano Monzani and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Angelo BarbatoIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-700X
Gioia BottesiDepartment of General Psychology, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Massimo BiondiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Mariangela CorboDepartment of Mental Health, ASREM, Campobasso, Italy.
Giovanni de GirolamoIRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Gerardo FavarettoAzienda ULSS n.2, Treviso, Italy.
Silvio GarattiniIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.
Paolo MigoneEditor, Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, Parma, Italy.
Paolo ModeratoDepartment of Marketing, Behavior, Communication 'G.P. Fabris', Università IULM, Milano, Italy.
Emiliano MonzaniASST di Bergamo Ovest, Bergamo, Italy.
Franco VeltroDepartment of Mental Health, ASREM, Campobasso, Italy.
Ezio SanavioDepartment of General Psychology, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Consorzio Milano Ricerche · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Padua · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITIULM University · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bergamo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Consensus Conference of clinicians, researchers, public health specialists and users was convened in Italy to review efficacy, effectiveness, treatment appropriateness and access to care for anxiety and depression, and to consider the role of psychological therapies. Expert opinion was sought concerning identification of people requiring psychological therapies according to levels of symptom severity matched to corresponding levels of treatment intensity, suitability of psychological therapies for subclinical anxiety or depression, definition of a minimum level of information on evidence-based psychotherapies to be provided by university medical and psychology courses, initiatives to raise awareness among potential users and decision makers on the role and effectiveness of psychological therapies in healthcare. The expert jury concluded that a number of psychological therapy models endorsed by most authoritative guidelines are supported by research showing their effectiveness at least equal to the drugs used in common mental disorders (CMDs). Such therapies are under-represented in the Italian public health system, leading many people to resort to the private sector, resulting in unacceptable wealth discrimination. The difficulty of accessing psychological treatments often entails the use of drug therapies in cases where they are not indicated. Starting from these assumptions, the experts recommended the promotion of better and timely recognition of anxiety and depressive disorders and their classification in terms of symptom intensity and functional impairment, differentiating subthreshold mood swings from clinical forms, to foster outcome studies of psychotherapies in CMDs in Italy, to introduce a stepped care model structured according to levels of intensity of treatment, based on wellbeing support strategies in nonmedical contexts for subthreshold situations, self-help, support and psychoeducation as frontline interventions in mild clinical forms, evidence-based psychotherapies in moderate and severe forms, with the option of combining psychological treatment and appropriate drug therapy in the most severe cases.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderAnxietyHumansItalyPsychotherapyCommon mental disorderscommunity mental healthevidence-based psychiatrypsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36511136
PMCPMC9762139
OpenAlexW4312066169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.