Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36511026›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Effect of local application of platelet-rich fibrin scaffold loaded with simvastatin on peri-implant bone changes.

Sara Fikry El Shafei, Shereen N Raafat, Ayman H Amin, Fardos N Rizk

Open access · diamondAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Using platelet concentrates to treat maxillofacial tissue lesions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Fikry El ShafeiDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt (BUE), Cairo, Egypt.
Shereen N RaafatDepartment of Phaarmacology, Director of Stem Cells and Tissue Culture Hub, Centre of Innovative Dental Sciences (CIDS), Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt (BUE), Cairo, Egypt.
Ayman H AminDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt (BUE), Cairo, Egypt.
Fardos N RizkDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt (BUE), Cairo, Egypt.
British University in Egypt · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) alone and PRF loaded with SIM on peri-implant bone changes and implant stability in patients undergoing implant rehabilitation. Settings and Design: This was a nonrandomized controlled split-mouth study. Materials and Methods: The study included 8 males between the ages of 45 and 60 years. Each patient received two implants, one on each side of the arch. One side was treated with PRF alone and the other side with PRF loaded with SIM at the time of osteotomy. A cone-beam computed tomography was used to evaluate bone changes around the insertion of implant sites at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The secondary outcome included measuring implant stability using Osstell device at baseline and 3 months postinsertion. To compare groups at different time periods, data were examined using a two-way analysis of variance. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were compared between the groups using a two-way analysis of variance, followed by a post hoc Bonferroni test. To examine total bone changes and stability comparisons between the two groups at the end of the trial, an unpaired t-test was utilized. Results: The mean crestal bone-level changes in the SIM/PRF group were significantly lower than the PRF group, with a mean shift of 0.9788 ± 0.04853 versus 1.356 ± 0.0434, respectively (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in implant stability. Conclusion: Peri-implant application of SIM/PRF resulted in less bone changes than PRF alone, which may prove to be beneficial for the long-term success of implants. SIM showed promising results in limiting peri-implant bone resorption providing new clinical application for SIM in dental implant rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsPlatelet-Rich FibrinBone TransplantationDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansMaleMiddle AgedSimvastatinDental ImplantsSimvastatinBone lossperi-implant bone changesplatelet-rich fibrinsimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID36511026
PMCPMC9132502
OpenAlexW4226390174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.