Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510772›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Dual Domestication, Diversity, and Differential Introgression in Old World Cotton Diploids.

Corrinne E Grover, Mark A Arick, Adam Thrash, Joel Sharbrough, Guanjing Hu, Daojun Yuan, Samantha Snodgrass, Emma R Miller, Thiruvarangan Ramaraj, Daniel G Peterson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic basis and role of exotic accessions in cultivated cotton fiber quality improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  3. First Complete Mitochondrial Genome Analysis of Tree Frog,International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Corrinne E GroverEcology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 5001, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3878-5459
Mark A ArickBiocomputing & Biotechnology, Institute for Genomics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-3052
Adam ThrashBiocomputing & Biotechnology, Institute for Genomics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4097-7663
Joel SharbroughBiology Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-1662
Guanjing HuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8552-7394
Daojun YuanCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-5571
Samantha SnodgrassEcology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 5001, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9209-6051
Emma R MillerEcology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 5001, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9009-5303
Thiruvarangan RamarajSchool of Computing, College of Computing and Digital Media, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 6060, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7333-1041
Daniel G PetersonBiocomputing & Biotechnology, Institute for Genomics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0274-5968
Joshua A UdallCrop Germplasm Research Unit, USDA/Agricultural Research Service, 2881 F&B Road, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-4764
Jonathan F WendelEcology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 5001, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2258-5081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestication in the cotton genus is remarkable in that it has occurred independently four different times at two different ploidy levels. Relatively little is known about genome evolution and domestication in the cultivated diploid species Gossypium herbaceum and Gossypium arboreum, due to the absence of wild representatives for the latter species, their ancient domestication, and their joint history of human-mediated dispersal and interspecific gene flow. Using in-depth resequencing of a broad sampling from both species, we provide support for their independent domestication, as opposed to a progenitor-derivative relationship, showing that diversity (mean π = 6 × 10-3) within species is similar, and that divergence between species is modest (FST = 0.413). Individual accessions were homozygous for ancestral single-nucleotide polymorphisms at over half of variable sites, while fixed, derived sites were at modest frequencies. Notably, two chromosomes with a paucity of fixed, derived sites (i.e., chromosomes 7 and 10) were also strongly implicated as having experienced high levels of introgression. Collectively, these data demonstrate variable permeability to introgression among chromosomes, which we propose is due to divergent selection under domestication and/or the phenomenon of F2 breakdown in interspecific crosses. Our analyses provide insight into the evolutionary forces that shape diversity and divergence in the diploid cultivated species and establish a foundation for understanding the contribution of introgression and/or strong parallel selection to the extensive morphological similarities shared between species.

Indexed as

DiploidyGossypiumDomesticationGenome, PlantPloidiescottondomesticationGossypium arboreumGossypium herbaceumintrogression

Identifiers

PMID36510772
PMCPMC9792962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.