Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510616›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain.

Dawood Sayed, Jay Grider, Natalie Strand, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Steven Falowski, Christopher M Lam, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Douglas P Beall, Nestor D Tomycz, Justin R Davanzo and 19 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06804551 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single-center, Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Iovera° Lumbar Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Facet-mediated Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsiovera system, Radiofrequency ablation alone
NCT07214844 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Assessor Blind, Active-controlled, Single-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Iovera Lumbar Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Facet-mediated Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2026 to 2028Enrolled110ConditionsLow Back Pain, ChronicArmsIovera Medial Branch Cryoneurolysis, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Motivational interviewing increases physical activity for adults with low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Jay GriderUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Natalie StrandInterventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-2550
Jonathan M HagedorniSpine Pain Physicians, Maple Grove, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-8166
Steven FalowskiFunctional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3996-087X
Christopher M LamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6513-0058
Douglas P BeallComprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, OK, USA.
Nestor D TomyczAHN Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Justin R DavanzoAHN Neurosurgery, Forbes Hospital, Monroeville, PA, USA.
Rohit AiyerInterventional Pain Management and Pain Psychiatry, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
David W LeePhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine, Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Hemant KaliaRochester Regional Health System, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9033-9080
Soun SheenDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mark N MalinowskiAdena Spine Center, Adena Health System, Chillicothe, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-4787
Michael VerdolinAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pain Consultants of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shashank VodapallyPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2672-5822
Alexios CarayannopoulosDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Newport Hospital, Lifespan Physician Group, Providence, RI, USA.
Sameer JainInterventional Pain Management, Pain Treatment Centers of America, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Nomen AzeemDepartment of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-5976
Reda TolbaPain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
George C Chang ChienPain Management, Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, CA, USA.
Priyanka GhoshRemedy Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anthony J MazzolaMount Sinai Health System, New York City, NY, USA.
Kasra AmirdelfanIPM Medical Group, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Krishnan ChakravarthyDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Erika PetersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-1450
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0413
Timothy DeerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
University of Kansas Medical Center · USAllegheny General Hospital · USBrown University · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USForbes Hospital · USFullerton College · USHenry Ford Health System · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMichigan State University · USMount Sinai Health System · USNew York University · USOhio University · USPain Management Centers Of America · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUnity Health System · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective: The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods: The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented. Results: After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain. Conclusion: The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.

Indexed as

back painclinical guidelineepidural steroid injectioninterventionlumbar disorderminimally invasive spine procedureradiofrequency ablationspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36510616
PMCPMC9739111
OpenAlexW4310725958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.