Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
The EVO ICL for Moderate Myopia: Results from the US FDA Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three Year Results from the United States FDA Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of the EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Trial
- Article
- AI-Assisted UBM versus Conventional Sizing Approaches for ICL Implantation: A Retrospective Analysis of Vault Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity and Vision Quality for High and Extreme High Myopia After EVO ICL Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Influence of Refractive Error, Age, and Ophthalmic Anatomical Characteristics on Refractive Surgery Choices.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- A pilot study of deep learning for automatic contouring of sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in ultrasound biomicroscopy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Characteristics of biological parameters and implantable collamer lens (ICL) size selection in moderate, high, and super-high myopia eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Diagnosis and treatment of pupillary block glaucoma following implantable collamer lens surgery: a case report.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Implantable Collamer Lenses for the Treatment of Myopia in Eyes with Anterior Chamber Depth (<3.0 mm) at a Single Center in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis of EVO/EVO+ Implantable Collamer Lens: Evaluating Refractive Outcomes in the Largest Single Center Study of ICL Patients in the United States.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of collamer posterior chamber phakic refractive lenses with a central port design (EVO and EVO+ Sphere and Toric implantable collamer lenses [ICLs]) for correction of moderate myopia with or without astigmatism. Patients and Methods: Six-month results of a multicenter clinical trial were performed under United States FDA Investigational Device Exemption. Subjects 21 through 45 years of age with manifest refraction spherical equivalent ranging from -3.00 D to -6.00 D and astigmatism up to 4.00 D underwent implantation of EVO or EVO+ Sphere or Toric ICLs. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density, and adverse events were evaluated over 6 months. Results: This report includes a retrospective review of 200 eyes of 114 subjects with mean age 35.1 ± 5.1 years that completed the 6-month visit. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) measured -4.61 ± 0.87 D (range: -3.00 to -6.00 D). At 6 months, mean SE was -0.085 ± 0.26 D, with 91.5% within ± 0.50 D of target and 100.0% within ±1.00 D of target. Mean postoperative UDVA and CDVA were -0.065 ± 0.08 logMAR and -0.14 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively. About 98.0% of eyes maintained or gained lines of CDVA, and no eye lost more than 1 line CDVA. Efficacy and safety indices were 1.03 and 1.21, respectively. No eye experienced pupillary block, required preoperative or postoperative peripheral iridotomy or iridectomy, developed anterior subcapsular cataract or had elevated IOP due to angle narrowing or pigment dispersion. Mean endothelial cell density declined by 2.2%. Conclusion: EVO ICL lenses demonstrated accuracy, predictability and stability of refractive correction with achievement of high levels of UDVA and an excellent safety profile for patients with moderate myopia with or without astigmatism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.