Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510349›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023

Data mining approaches for type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction using anthropometric measurements.

Maryam Saberi-Karimian, Amin Mansoori, Maryam Mohammadi Bajgiran, Zeinab Sadat Hosseini, Amir Kiyoumarsioskouei, Elias Sadooghi Rad, Mostafa Mahmoudi Zo, Negar Yeganeh Khorasani, Mohadeseh Poudineh, Sara Ghazizadeh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maryam Saberi-KarimianInternational UNESCO center for Health Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amin MansooriInternational UNESCO center for Health Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam Mohammadi BajgiranInternational UNESCO center for Health Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zeinab Sadat HosseiniFaculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Amir KiyoumarsioskoueiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.
Elias Sadooghi RadStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mostafa Mahmoudi ZoStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Negar Yeganeh KhorasaniStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohadeseh PoudinehStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sara GhazizadehDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Gordon FernsBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Division of Medical Education, Brighton, UK.
Habibollah EsmailyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Majid Ghayour-MobarhanInternational UNESCO center for Health Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-6754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the anthropometric measurements most associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using machine learning approaches.

methodsA prospective study was designed for a total population of 9354 (43% men and 57% women) aged 35-65. Anthropometric measurements include weight, height, demispan, Hip Circumference (HC), Mid-arm Circumference (MAC), Waist Circumference (WC), Body Roundness Index (BRI), Body Adiposity Index (BAI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), Body Mass Index (BMI), Waist-to-height Ratio (WHtR), and Waist-to-hip Ratio (WHR) were completed for all participants. The association was assessed using logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to evaluate the DT's accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity using R software.

resultsTraditionally, 1461 women and 875 men with T2DM (T2DM group). According to the LR, in males, WC and BIA (p-value < 0.001) and in females, demispan and WC (p-value < 0.001) had the highest correlation with T2DM development risk. The DT indicated that WC has the most crucial effect on T2DM development risk, followed by HC, and BAI.

conclusionsOur results showed that in both men and women, WC was the most important anthropometric factor to predict T2DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Body Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleObesityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveWaist CircumferenceWaist-Height RatioWaist-Hip Ratioanthropometricdata miningdecision treediabetes

Identifiers

PMID36510349
PMCPMC9833979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.