Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510330›Full record

ReviewArthritis research & therapy2022

Artificial intelligence and the future of radiographic scoring in rheumatoid arthritis: a viewpoint.

Alix Bird, Lauren Oakden-Rayner, Christopher McMaster, Luke A Smith, Minyan Zeng, Mihir D Wechalekar, Shonket Ray, Susanna Proudman, Lyle J Palmer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alix BirdAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Corner Frome Road and North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. alix.bird@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-0822
Lauren Oakden-RaynerAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Corner Frome Road and North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Christopher McMasterDepartment of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Luke A SmithAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Corner Frome Road and North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Minyan ZengAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Corner Frome Road and North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Mihir D WechalekarDepartment of Rheumatology, Flinders Medical Centre, and College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Shonket RayArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, GlaxoSmithKline, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Susanna ProudmanDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Lyle J PalmerAustralian Institute of Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Corner Frome Road and North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Australian Centre for Robotic Vision · AUAustin Health · AUFlinders University · AUGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune condition that predominantly affects the synovial joints, causing joint destruction, pain, and disability. Historically, the standard for measuring the long-term efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has been the assessment of plain radiographs with scoring techniques that quantify joint damage. However, with significant improvements in therapy, current radiographic scoring systems may no longer be fit for purpose for the milder spectrum of disease seen today. We argue that artificial intelligence is an apt solution to further improve upon radiographic scoring, as it can readily learn to recognize subtle patterns in imaging data to not only improve efficiency, but can also increase the sensitivity to variation in mild disease. Current work in the area demonstrates the feasibility of automating scoring but is yet to take full advantage of the strengths of artificial intelligence. By fully leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, faster and more sensitive scoring could enable the ongoing development of effective treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidArtificial IntelligenceDisease ProgressionHumansJointsAntirheumatic AgentsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningRadiographic scoringRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID36510330
PMCPMC9743640
OpenAlexW4311680072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.