ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2022
The value of QT interval in differentiating vasovagal syncope from epilepsy in children.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope in children and adolescents (revised 2024).World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Guideline
- Research progress on the relationship between long QT syndrome (LQTS) and epilepsy: A review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of Factors Relevant to the Severity of Symptoms in Children and Adolescents with Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoth vasovagal syncope (VVS) and epilepsy present with transient loss of consciousness and are often difficult to identify. Hence this study aimed to explore the value of QT interval in the differentiation of VVS and epilepsy in children.
methodsOne hundred thirteen children with unexplained transient loss of consciousness were selected. 56 children with VVS (VVS group), including 37 males and 19 females, the average age is 9.88 ± 2.55 years old. 57 children with epilepsy (epilepsy group), including 36 males and 21 females, the average age is 8.96 ± 2.67 years old. At the same time, the 60 healthy individuals (control group) were examined according to age and sex. The QT interval of 12-lead electrocardiogram in a basal state of three groups was measured and statistically analyzed by SPSS 24.0 software.
resultsCompared with the control group, (1) QTcmax, QTcmin and QTcd were significantly longer in VVS group (P < 0.05), QTmax and QTmin were significantly shorter in VVS group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in QTd between the two groups (P > 0.05). (2) The QTmax and QTmin were significantly shorter in epilepsy group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in QTd, QTcmax, QTcmin, QTcd between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the epilepsy group, The QTcmax, QTcmin, QTcd were significantly longer in VVS group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences in QTd, QTmax, QTmin between the two groups (P > 0.05). When QTcmax > 479.84 ms, QTcmin > 398.90 ms and QTcd > 53.56 ms, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing VVS were 62.5% and 77.19%, 82.14% and 50.88%, 82.14% and 38.60% respectively.
conclusionQTcmax, QTcmin and QTcd have certain value in differentiating VVS from epilepsy in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.