Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510171›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Application of a deep learning system in glaucoma screening and further classification with colour fundus photographs: a case control study.

Kuo-Hsuan Hung, Yu-Ching Kao, Yu-Hsuan Tang, Yi-Ting Chen, Chuen-Heng Wang, Yu-Chen Wang, Oscar Kuang-Sheng Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kuo-Hsuan HungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No.5, Fu-Hsing St., Kuei Shan Hsiang, Tao Yuan Hsien, Taiwan.
Yu-Ching KaoMuen Biomedical and Optoelectronics Technologies Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsuan TangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.201, Sec.2, Shih-Pai Rd. Peitou, R.O.C, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Yi-Ting ChenMuen Biomedical and Optoelectronics Technologies Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Chuen-Heng WangMuen Biomedical and Optoelectronics Technologies Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen WangMuen Biomedical and Optoelectronics Technologies Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Oscar Kuang-Sheng LeeInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.201, Sec.2, Shih-Pai Rd. Peitou, R.O.C, Taipei, 112, Taiwan. oscarlee9203@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo verify efficacy of automatic screening and classification of glaucoma with deep learning system.

methodsA cross-sectional, retrospective study in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with healthy optic disc, high-tension, or normal-tension glaucoma were enrolled. Complicated non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy was excluded. Colour and red-free fundus images were collected for development of DLS and comparison of their efficacy. The convolutional neural network with the pre-trained EfficientNet-b0 model was selected for machine learning. Glaucoma screening (Binary) and ternary classification with or without additional demographics (age, gender, high myopia) were evaluated, followed by creating confusion matrix and heatmaps. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score were viewed as main outcome measures.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-two cases (421 eyes) were enrolled, with 1851 images in total (1207 normal and 644 glaucomatous disc). Train set and test set were comprised of 1539 and 312 images, respectively. If demographics were not provided, AUC, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and specificity of our deep learning system in eye-based glaucoma screening were 0.98, 0.91, 0.86, 0.86, 0.86, and 0.94 in test set. Same outcome measures in eye-based ternary classification without demographic data were 0.94, 0.87, 0.87, 0.87, 0.87, and 0.94 in our test set, respectively. Adding demographics has no significant impact on efficacy, but establishing a linkage between eyes and images is helpful for a better performance. Confusion matrix and heatmaps suggested that retinal lesions and quality of photographs could affect classification. Colour fundus images play a major role in glaucoma classification, compared to red-free fundus images.

conclusionsPromising results with high AUC and specificity were shown in distinguishing normal optic nerve from glaucomatous fundus images and doing further classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaOptic DiskCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFundus OculiHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveColour fundus photographDeep learning systemGlaucoma screening and classificationHigh myopiaNormal- tension glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID36510171
PMCPMC9743575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.